— —
Follow on X
LESSONS

The Blocksize War

From 2015 to 2017 big-block proposals backed by most miners and businesses tried to change Bitcoin. Node operators refused, enforced SegWit themselves, and won. It defined who rules.

8 MIN READ
Timeline of the Blocksize War from 2015 to 2017.
LEVEL · Advanced
IN THIS LESSON · 3 OF 7
BY THE END YOU WILL BE ABLE TO ANSWER
  • What did the New York Agreement propose?
  • What forced miners to signal for SegWit in July 2017?
  • What did the Blocksize War establish?

Then prove it: a 3-question quiz. The lesson marks itself complete at 100%.

The disagreement

As blocks filled in 2015, one camp argued the 1 MB limit should rise so fees stayed low and bitcoin could be everyday cash: "big blockers". The other argued that larger blocks would make running a node expensive, concentrating validation in data centres and companies, and that scaling belonged in layers: "small blockers". Underneath was a deeper question: is Bitcoin a payment network run by its businesses, or a settlement layer verified by its users?

The campaigns

  • Bitcoin XT (2015), Classic and Unlimited (2016): alternative implementations with bigger blocks, each backed by prominent developers, miners and companies. None reached the adoption needed.
  • SegWit (2016): the Core developers' proposal, a soft fork that fixed malleability and modestly raised capacity. Big-block miners refused to signal for it for months, using BIP 9's threshold as a veto.
  • The New York Agreement (May 2017): about 58 companies and most of the hash rate agreed to SegWit2x: activate SegWit, then hard-fork to 2 MB blocks months later. Negotiated in a closed meeting. No Core developers attended.

The users' move

BIP 148, the user-activated soft fork: from 1 August 2017, participating nodes would reject any block that did not signal for SegWit. It threatened to split the chain unless miners complied. A grassroots campaign spread it. Facing the prospect of mining a chain the economic majority would not value, miners began signalling in late July. SegWit locked in and activated on 24 August.

The split and the collapse

On 1 August, big blockers forked Bitcoin Cash with 8 MB blocks. It traded at a fraction of bitcoin's price and still does. In November, the SegWit2x hard fork was cancelled for lack of support days before its block height.

What it settled

Hash power and corporate consensus cannot change Bitcoin's rules against the will of the people who run nodes and hold coins. The chain stayed small-block, Lightning became possible, and a precedent was set that every later proposal is measured against. Jonathan Bier's book The Blocksize War is the detailed history.

Why You Can't Kill Bitcoin · On resilience and governanceWatch on YouTube ↗
CHECK YOURSELF
1/3 What did the New York Agreement propose?
2/3 What forced miners to signal for SegWit in July 2017?
3/3 What did the Blocksize War establish?
pick an answer for each question

SOURCES

  1. The Blocksize War, Jonathan Bier (2021)
Progress is saved in this browser only.